SESSION PROCEDURES REPORT. CONTROL NUMBER: 'OTHER E'. SESSION NUMBER: ERV-02. SOURCE IDENTIFIER: RV-101

CIA-STARGATE

PDF Scan: PDF

Open AI Summary

Text

Body:  Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900700001-4
 MONOMM/NOFORN - SKEET CHANNELS ONLY
 PROJECT SUN STREAK  (U)
 ERV SESSION PROCEDURES REPORT
 WARNING NOTICE:    INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED
 DATE OF SESSION:   31 Jul 86                       TARGET COUNTRY:  Unknown
 E- SSio-J Nz'   9 Z
 REFERENCES:   SPR-001-86, 29 Jul 86, SAB           MISSION STATUS:  Continuing
 DATE OF REPORT:   5 Aug 86                         SOURCE IDENTIFIER:   101
 -------------------------------------------------
 ~+fj7YL~( fitZR/t ~/ ~
 1.   (           ) TASKING:   In addition to data provided in initial session
 pre-briefing, (see SPR -001-86, SAB, referenced above), the interviewer was
 told that it appeared that Source had successfully acquired the general area
 of the site but had not, as yet, begun reporting on the specific tasking, e.g.,
 the nature of the material being stored at this facility.         Therefore the
 interviewer was directed to retarget the Source by informing him to "go to
 the same site as before where you described a cast iron object.        When you
 get there disregard the object and move around the entire site.  There is
 another gestalt that is of interest to us and that is what we want you to
 report on".  Just prior to the actual session, the Source was again provided the
 same encrypted coodinates given during the initial session with no other cueing
 or descriptive data except as stated above.
 2.   (            )   SESSION:  There were no unusual occurrences, incl8.mencies or
 external environmental conditions known to the interviewer which may have
 influenced the results of this session.  The session was conducted utilizing
 only standard ERV protocols.
 3.   (          )   SUMMARY:
 1
 a.   (              )   (The following narrative contained within quotation marks is
 an abridged copy of Source's post-session written summary.  This summary has been
 editorialized,  (as.indicated), by the undersigned, for clarity, grammar and
 structure.  The actual unabridged summary is maintained in the mission
 field dossier at this location along with other material produced during
 this session, e.g., sketches, notes, etc)."   (The) site is a large fenced in
 building by (the ocean).   (There are) at least two other buildings inside (this)
 fence line.  One (of these buildings) resembles a cuppola (and is located)
 between (one of the) buildings and the sea.   Entering the cuppola (lpke building),
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900700001-4
 i
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900700001-4
 I see (a) large object, taller than a man.   (As I ) move away (from this object)
 I (see another) object (resembling) a piano.   (This) object takes on some of the
 attributes of the (larger) object (and they) are possibly related (in some way).
 (I am confused) by the number of angles and corners ( in the building).   Perhaps
 I am not in the cuppola (like building).   (I see) a long, low, thin, white,
 plastic like table.   (There) are chairs on both sides of the table.   (The) table
 is too thin ( narrow) to be functional.
 I (re-target myself) to (acquire) the area of (specific.) interest (and)
 I see an area (resembling) a "bookie joint."   (There is) a long table against
 (the) wall.   (The) table (resembles) an (electronic technician's) workshop.
 (By) the right leg of the table (there) are three men concentrating intently
 (on an object on the table) while moving and manipulating their hands.   (They)
 are bent over the table.  On the table is an object that looks like a twelve foot
 long "submarine sandwich".   It was tubular (in shape) and encased (in something).
 (The object) is designed to improve something that already exists.   It will
 improve the capability of (an) existing system.
 During the session, I got (a feeling) of (impressions) Gulf Port Mississippi,
 (the) New England sea Coast and Italian Chefs."
 b.   (          )  During the actual session, Source reported other data
 which may impact on the final assessment of this target.. That data is listed
 below in raw unevaluated form:
 (1)   (           )  An impression of a well tended landscaped garden
 area in the vicinity of the target site.
 (2)   (      )   The air within the cuppola-like builidng seems to be
 artificially clean, arid and cooled.
 (3)   (      )   Within the building there are movable shelves, like
 bookcases on wheels.
 (4)   (     )  The "desks" referenced in Sources's narrative summary
 were described as having a cubed shape on the bottom with a curved triangular
 shape on the top giving the overall impression of a small house (dog-house)
 appearance.   Significant reference words for the "desks" included:   "logistician,"
 "console," "shipment," "saddlebags (sic),"transferring to ships," "establishing
 linkages," "shuffling," "monitoring" and visual impression of a small game board
 with lights connecting "dot to dot to dot-to dot, etc."                           q'
 (5)   (       )  The object being worked-on at the table (referenced in $
 Source's summary) was further described as:   "chock full," "tapered at both ends,"
 "malleable," and "fragile,' Other significant reference words for this object
 included:   "condensing," "concentrating," "enhancing (an important reference),"
 "development," "chastisement" and "questioning."  This object is described as
 a portion of a system which cannot, in itself, be used alone, but in conjunction
 with other systems for enhancement and "increasing range (reach)."
 4.   (          )  OPS FEEDBACK:   Source continues to evade the actual targetting,
 e.g. what is being stored in the buildings at the given coordinate.  He does,
 however, seem to be picking away at the peripheral "noise" as he, hopefully,
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900700001-4
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900700001-4
 moves towards the site specific tasking.   Just prior to the next session, Source
 will be told to move to the buildings, "near the harbor used for storage and describe
 the contents."  This is not considered inappropriate cueing since Source has
 on his own, reported one target as being next to the sea, consisting of
 multiple building, containing multiples of the same items, e.g., "desks,"
 "bookcases" etc.  By progression then, the implied inference is a port with
 storage buildings.  No other cueing or descriptive data,.other than that
 provided above and the original coordinaltes will be provided.  Following
 this session Source was not told the time or date of the next session.
 SGFOIA3
 Approved For Release 2000/08/98 : CIA-RDP96-00789R001900700001-4