TRANSCRIPT SUMMARY REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-61

CIA-STARGATE

PDF Scan: PDF

Open AI Summary

Summary:

This document is a summary analysis of a remote viewing session conducted as part of the CIA's Grill Flame program. The remote viewer provided impressions of a target location, including the description of masonry buildings, a large entry hall with guards, and a "general officer" who appeared to be in a position of power. The "general officer" was observed in a shiny black car with another person, pouring over charts or maps depicting a geographic area with a road network. The remote viewer believed this symbol represented the highest place the "general officer" could go in his chain of command and that he had anxiety about it. The document also states that the "general officer" had important future activities and plans, but these were likely to be delayed due to a situation beyond his control. Control analyst comments guided the session and provided guidance on specific questions to ask the target. Overall, this document provides information on the impressions and insights gained from a remote viewing session.

Text

Body:  Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500500001-2
 INSCOM
 GRILL FLAME
 PROGRAM
 CLASSIFIED BY:MSG,DAMI-ISI-I
 DATED:  051630ZJUL78
 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS    REVIEW ON:         D uU L.
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R0005005OOOL BILL FLAN
 Approved For Release 20  /    7              07888000500500001-2
 SUMMARY ANALYSIS
 REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-61
 1.  (S/NOFORN)  This report documents a remote viewing session conducted in
 compliance with a request for information.
 2.. (S/NOFORN)  The remote viewer's impressions of the target are provided
 as raw intelligence data, and as such, have not been subjected to any
 intermediate analysis, evaluation or collation.  Interpretation and use of
 the information provided is the responsibility of the requestor.
 3.  (S/NOFORN)  The protocol used for this session is detailed in the document
 Grill Flame Protocol, AMSAA Applied Remote Viewing Protocol (S), undated.
 4.  (S/NOFORN)  Following is a summary of the viewer's impressions during
 the remote viewing session.  At TAB A are drawings made by the remote viewer
 reference his impressions of the target site.  At tAB B is target cuing
 information provided the remote viewer.  At TAB C are control analyst comments.
 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500500001-2
 Approved For Release 20=Z610      07888000500500001-2
 TRANSCRIPT SUMMARY
 REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-61
 1.  (S/NOFORN)  Source #07 provided the following information regarding
 the vicinity of UTM coordinates                   at 1600 hours on
 27 May 1981 at the target location. SG1A
 a.  Several masonry buildings were observed, one of which had
 6 to 8 masonry steps leading to a broad platform type porch.  This porch
 area had columns attached to the building.  To the left of the porch on
 the left side of the building was a long overhang.  To the rear (opposite
 from porch area) either a "wing" or a separate building protruded to the
 left.
 b.  To the right and rear of the building are rugged hills or cliffs.
 To the right of the building is another smaller building.
 c.  Inside the main door of the masonry building (the end away from
 the hills) is a large entry hall or big room having a guard standing at
 attention and a desk nearby which resembled a "desk watch" during quiet hours.
 The building houses"high ranking people" concerned with an area which could be
 intelligence or something similar.
 d.  The highest ranking or most important individual in the building was
 located to the right and deeper into the building at a place having another
 open foyer area and guard.  The heavy "pomp" and protection surrounding this
 person made it appear he was a general officer.
 2.  (S/NOFORN)  At the time of observation this "general officer" was located
 elsewhere.  Further data is as follows:
 a.  The "general officer" was described as being 5'9" to 5' 10" in
 height.   160 lbs in weight, having dark hair and a roundish face, and being
 cleanshaven.
 b.  The "general officer" was located with another undescribed person
 in the back seat of a shiny black car having a chauffeur which was (at the
 time) moving through city traffic.  The two persons were unperturbed, as
 though they were used to the horns and noises of such traffic.
 c.  The "general officer" was not in uniform as would be expected.  He
 was observed "pouring over" some sort of charts or maps having a large round
 symbol with dadiating lines (sketch #2) believed to designate a geographic
 area with a road network like divided highway(s).,.Source #07 believed that
 the circle/lines represented the highest place "that the general officer"
 could go in his chain (of command    "The buck stops here,"so to speak.
 Approved For Release 200010          PE P   d!1  88000500500001-2
 Approved For Release 2000  /                 7888000500500001-2
 Also,the circle represented the seat of political power, and the "general
 officer" had anxiety about the place thusly designated.
 d.  When observed in the car, the "general officer" was believed to
 be traveling enroute to a big meeting, and that that fact was important to
 him.  Also, the source believed that the "general officer" was concerned
 with troops having a symbol association with a feline.type carnivorous animal
 such as a lion or tiger.  The source's feeling was that the "general officer"
 had either just received tremendous power, or had a potential to achieve
 tremendous power and notariety.  There existed a perceived threat, and ho,-!had
 been given the authority to deal with it.
 3.  (S/NOFORN)  Source #07 provided the following information regarding the
 "general officer's" future activities/plans up to Fall 1981.
 a.  His plan of action "doesn't come off."  It might have, but in his
 eagerness he"showed his hand,"   making him feel vulnerable in relation to a
 couple of powerful people who otherwise would have been neutral.  As a result,
 the whole thing will be just delayed, but he will not know for how long.  He
 will feel he lost some ground politically.  The terms 1D or ID will be
 important to him.  This situation will occur because something beyond his
 control will sour and the overall effort will "peter out."
 Approved For Release 2000/
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500500001-2
 TAB
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500500001-2
 Approved For Rglgase98GLp$/;p,
 x
 J
 ApprovedFRrRel                         a,2nn+ingin      -          88R000500500001-2
 Approved For Release 2000/08/Q'/''CIA-RDP96-00788R000500500001-2
 ON
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500500001-2
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07
 TAB
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500500001-2
 Approved For Release 200 907888000500500001-2
 K
 TARGET CUING INFORMATION
 REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-61
 1.  (S/NOFORN)  The remote viewer was not given a pre-mission briefing.
 2.  (S/NOFORN)  During the session the remote aviewer
 ercwaseasked
 ttt oggo tt
 oea
 the following UTM coordinate:
 at 1600 hours local target time on the 27th of May 1981.
 SG1A
 NATIONALS
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 :-CIA-RDP96-00788R000500500001-2
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500500001-2
 TAB
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500500001-2
 Approved For Release 200
 CONTROL ANALYST COMMENTS
 REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION DCC-61
 1.  (S/NOFORN)  Prior to the session, interviewer #14 was provided a sheet
 of paper with the following data:
 a.   Targeting Data (for IVer and RVer):                    SG1A
 (1)  Your target as designated by the UTM coordinate
 (2)  Access the target at 1600 hours, today (27 May 1981), at the
 target location.
 b.   EEI: (for IVer only)
 (1)  General description of the target area.
 (2)  Move throughout area obtaining general activity descriptors
 and quick descriptions.
 (3)  Move in time to 3 June 1981, 1600 hours - describe any changes
 in activity or activity levels.
 2.  (S/NOFORN)  Prior to the session, the control analyst advised the IVer
 that the greatest interest was in the activity within about 1KM radius of the
 target location.  IVer #14 was instructed to move the RUer around and not let
 (07) get "bogged down" in minute detail,:
 3.  (S/NOFORN)  In-session Guidance:  During the session the control analyst
 provided the interviewer the following guidance/direction at the approximate
 times indicated:
 a.  +07 min: "Move(#07) around the building - get a four-sided description."
 b.  +11 min: "Move(#07) around the building."
 c.  +15 min: "Have (#07) expand consciousness and determine the purpose
 or function of the building."
 d.  +20 min: "Have (#07) locate the highest ranking individual assigned
 or associated with this building."
 e.  +20 min: (correction) "Have (#07) locate the most important indi-
 vidual associated with this building."
 Ion
 Approved For Release 2000/0   7 :"C.IA-RDP96 00788R000500500001-2
 Approved For Release 2
 007888000500500001-2
 f.  +23 min: "Beacon in on him and find him regardless of place."
 g.  +25 min: "When you think ((#07's) ready, have (#07) ask him what
 his most important concerns are at this time."
 h.  +36 min: "Ask him what's the meaning of the round thing in the
 chart or map."
 i.  +36 min: "Have (#07) ask the guy."
 j.  +45 min: "Okay, now we need to know if the 'general' ever really
 does use his power to gain notariety.  I don't know how to do it, think
 about it."
 k.  +51 min:  "(#07) used the term 'showed his hand.'  I'd like to
 know if he 'played his hand.'  In other words, did he actually move?"
 1.  +55 min: "Let's have (#07) visualize a time line.  Let's figure
 out how far ahead in the future (#07) is."
 m.. +55 min: "That's the last question.  Bring (#07) back after we
 get an answer.
 KENNETH V. BELL
 CPT, MI
 Analyst
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500500001-2