TRANSCRIPT SUMMARY REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION D-98

CIA-STARGATE

PDF Scan: PDF

Open AI Summary

Text

Body:  Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 CT
 INSCOM
 GRILL FLAME
 PROGRAM
 CLASSIFIED BY:MSG,DAf1I-ISH
 DATED:  051630ZJUL7B
 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS       REVIEW ON:C~.   CI-
 ... -         ,9O LL FLAMF
 Approved For Release 2                       0788R00050063
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 SUMMARY ANALYSIS
 REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION D-98
 1.  (S/NOFORN)  This report documents a remote viewing session conducted in
 compliance wit    re nest for information on a target of interest.  The mission
 was to locate
 2.  (S/NOFORN)  The protocol used for this session is detailed in the document
 rill Flame Protocol, AMSAA Applied Remote Viewing Protocol (5), undated.
 3.  (S/NOFORN)  At TAB A is a summary of the data presented by the remote
 viewer during the session.  A complete transcript of the session is available
 upon request.   At TAB B are drawings made by the remote viewer reference his
 impressions of the target site.  At TAB C is the map on which the viewer indi-
 cated where he thought the target(s) were located.  At TAB D is target cuing
 information provided the remote viewer.
 4.  (S/NOFORN)  The summary at TAB A represents the salient points provided by
 the remote viewer and as such has not been subjected to any intermediate analysis,
 evaluation or collation.  Interpretation and use of the information provided is
 the responsibility of the requestor.
 NOT RELEA~AQ
 Approved For Release 200270 VI
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 TAB
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 1.  (S/NOFORN)  The following information was obtained at 1130 hours,
 30 October 1980.  Source #01.
 a.  (S/NOFORN)  Source reported on two (2) locations (see TAB C) and was not   SG1A
 sure if the data was related to an old site and new site
 TRANSCRIPT SUMMARY
 REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION D-98
 b.  (S/NOFORN)  Source felt that site #1 was near mountain range that split
 U.S.S.R.  He reported that area was in very early stage of contruction.  He
 described a major river as running ENE to WSW just south of construction site.
 Source reported that a good size city was located just to the NE.  Source indi-
 cated that city was termination point for major rail lines coming from West and
 South..   He reported that no railroads went out easterly from this city.  Source
 stated that city was 120-150 miles from northern border of U.S.S.R.
 c.  (S/NOFORN)  The second possible area was described as being located
 about 100 miles in from the Polish border (see drawing 2).  He was not sure if
 construction at this site was complete.
 d.  (S/NOFORN)  Source felt that construction of third site would not complete
 the cycle.  That is, he felt that there would be a total of 5 sites when the
 Soviets were finished construction of this type installation.  However, he felt
 that the Soviets were constructing these installations in a checkable pattern.
 He explained this pattern as being an orientation of "Great Circle Azimuths",
 (GCA's).
 e.    (S/NOFORN)  Source reported that site #1 was located near a city that
 began with the letter "M" and ended in something like "ieske".  He felt it was
 a strange Russian name.  Further, he reported that the city was "just coming
 into age"....the city. is very old but just recently has it taken on importance
 in an industrial/economic sense.
 f.    (S/NOFOR N) Source indicated that all materials used for constructing
 these sites come from 2 other production plants (in addition to the one he
 had been briefed on).     He felt that all of these plants were located outside of
 Moscow (see drawing 3).
 Approved For Release 2 0    /
 (S/NOFORN)  Source felt that water is very important to these sites.
 2.   (S/NOFORN)  Although source indicated on the attached the probable locations
 of the sites, he felt very concerned about his "best guess" way of trying to
 relate his data to the map since:
 a.   The map threw him off.
 b.   Not used to the way the land forms were projected on the map.
 c.   Felt that topographic map would be more useful (Note:  We could not do
 anything to overcome this problem since we were limited to resources provided by
 tasking agency.)
 Approved For Relea
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 3.  (S/NOFORN)  Request the above information, once evaluated, be returned with
 comments to this office (ATTN:  IAOPS-H-S).  Comments should be in writing.  This
 will permit a full evaluation of the source of information by this office.  A
 detailed transcript can be provided concerning the above project session if
 necessary.
 Approved For Release 0J       ( I DP96-00788R000500630001-8
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 TAB
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 :CIA-RDP96-00788RQV;0T630001-8
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 Approved For Release 2002/05/1 : CIA-RDP96-00788R00050)630001-8
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 TAB
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 TAB
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8
 Approved For Release X002/0.5/_1.7  GJA6-00788R000500630001-8
 TAFG ET CUING INFORMATION
 REMOTE VIEWING (RV) SESSION D-98
 1.  (S/NOFORN)  Prior to the session fhp viewer was shown several photographs
 (provided by the tasking agency) of
 photographs depicted the site during various stages of development.  The viewer
 was also shown a photo of a production plant which apparently produces items
 used in the construction process at the sites.  The photographs are not included
 in this report due to their classification.
 S NOFORN   The viewer was told that USI was trying to locate where the
 SG1A
 3.  (U)  Prior to the.session, all material relating to this project was stored
 in the SSO facility with access to the material being limited to the project
 manager.
 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREI13N-NATIONALS
 ,OR SON
 Approved For Release 2002/05/17 : CIA-RDP96-00788R000500630001-8