TARGET AND SENDER DEPENDENCIES IN ANOMALOUS COGNITION EXPERIMENTS
CIA-STARGATE
PDF Scan: PDF
Open AI Summary
The document is a journal article titled "Target and Sender Dependencies in Anomalous Cognition Experiments." The article discusses the results of experiments conducted to determine whether a sender is necessary in nonganzfeld, free-response trials. The first experiment involved five experienced receivers who participated in 40 trials each, exploring different conditions related to sender and target type. The study found significant effects for static targets, but only chance results for dynamic targets.
Text
Body: Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00787R000300280001-0
The Journal of Parapsychology TheJournal of ParapsycholoD?, Vol. 58, September 1994
PUTHOFF, H. E., & TARO, R. (1976). A perceptual channel for information
transfer over kilometer distances: Historical perspective and recent research.
Proceedings IEEE, 64, 329-354.
ScoTT, C. (1972). On the evaluation of verbal material in parapsychology: A
discussion of Dr. Pratt's monograph. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research,
46, 79-90.
SPERRY, R. W. (1961). Cerebral organization and behavior. Science, 133, 1749-
1757.
TARG, R., & PIJTHOFF, H. E. (1974). Information transfer under conditions of
sensory shielding. Nature, 252, 602-607.
Bay Research Institute
1010 Harriet Street
Palo Alto, CA 94301
TARGET AND SENDER DEPENDENCIES IN
ANOMALOUS COGNITION EXPERIMENTS
ABSTRACT: The ganzfeld experiments as summarized by Bern and Honorton (1994)
suggest that using dynamic targets produces stronger results than using static ones. Berry
and Honorton, however, only analyzed ganzfeld studies that included the use of a sender.
Because a sender is not a necessary requirement in forced-choice trials, we designed and
carried out a study to see if a sender is required in nonganzfeld, free-response trials. In the
first of two experiments, five experienced receivers participated in 40 trials each, 10 in
each condition of a 2x2 design to explore sender and target type. We observed significant
effects for static targets (exact sum-of-rank probability of p < .0073, effect size = 0.248, n
= 100), chance results for dynamic targets (p