AUTONOMIC DETECTION OF REMOTE OBSERVATION: TWO CONCEPTUAL REPLICATIONS

CIA-STARGATE

PDF Scan: PDF

Open AI Summary

According to a document from the CIA's Stargate program, two experiments were conducted to test if people can unconsciously detect when someone is staring at them from a distance. The experiments used a closed-circuit television set-up, with a video camera focused on the subject (Observee) and another person (Observer) in a different room staring at the live image on a monitor. The goal was to eliminate any conventional sensory contact between the two individuals. The Observee's galvanic skin responses were monitored, and a computerized system recorded and averaged their physiological responses during monitoring periods. The experiments included both periods of remote observation and control periods with no observation attempts. The results showed that there was significantly more autonomic activity during the remote observation periods compared to the control periods.

Text

Body:  Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R003200140001-1
 AUTONOMIC DETECTION OF REMOTE OBSERVATION:
 Two Conceptual Replications)
 Marilyn J. Schlitz
 Cognitive Sciences Laboratory,
 Science Applications International Corporation
 and
 Stephen LaBerge
 The Lucidity Institute
 ABSTRACT: Two experiments were conducted to measure the extent to which
 people are able to unconsciously detect another person staring at them from a
 distance. A closed-circuit television set-up was employed in which a video
 camera was focused on the experimental volunteer (Observee) while a person
 in another room (Observer) concentrated on the image of the distant person as
 displayed on a color monitor; this procedure was used to preclude any
 conventional sensory contact -between the two people.   During the
 experimental session, the Observee's galvanic skin responses were monitored.
 An automated and computerized system was programmed to record and
 average the physiological responses of the Observee during 32 30-second
 monitoring periods. A random sequence was used to schedule 16 periods of
 remote observation and 16 control periods when no observation efforts were
 attempted.  A within-subjects evaluation was made for each experimental
 session with a comparison between the mean amount of autonomic nervous
 system activity during the experimental and control conditions. Twenty four
 sessions were conducted in each of two experiments.  As predicted, both
 experiments yielded significantly more autonomic activity during the remote
 observation periods as compared to control periods (Experiment 1: t=1.878,
 p