PROJECT EVALUATION FORM

CIA-STARGATE

PDF Scan: PDF

Open AI Summary

This document appears to be a form used to evaluate information submitted for the CIA's Stargate program. It includes sections for the sponsor's office, target site identification, project number, and source number. It also has sections for the evaluation of the information's value, the types of products it can benefit, and the degree of requirement satisfaction. The form also includes sections for remarks, disclosure data, and the evaluator's information. Overall, it is a standardized form to assess the usefulness of information gathered through the Stargate program.

Text

Body:  Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5 Dow PT
 1., SPONSOR'S OFFICE:
 2.  INFORMATION REQUEST DATE:
 3.  TARGET SITE IDENTIFICATION:
 4.  PROJECT NUMBER:
 5.  SOURCE NUMBER:
 6.  NUMBER OF REPORTS SUBMITTED FOR PROJECT:
 7.  REPORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS AND DATES:
 8.  REFERENCES:
 a.  Requirements (Cite)
 (ICR/CIR/DIRM 3/DIRM 9)
 b.  Initiative Report
 9.  REASON FOR EVALUATION (select one)
 a.  ICR Response
 b.  Collectors Request
 co  Selected by Analyst
 10.  VALUE OF INFORMATION (select one)
 a.  Major Significant Value (narrative comment required; include report
 numbers, specific information in the report which was valueable, and
 why it was of value)
 b.  Valueable (narrative comment required; include report numbers,
 specific information in the report which was valueable, and why
 it was of value)
 wA , sU4
 oaM,Ta.r erawranaN
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5
 /      c.  No Value (see Item 12p below)
 11.   TYPES OF PRODUCTS TO BENEFIT FROM USE OF REPORTED INFORMATION (select one or
 more and describe how the products will benefit)
 a.  Basic Intelligence
 b.  Current Intelligence
 c.  Estimative Intelligence
 d.  S&T Intelligence
 12.  REASON INFORMATION IS OF NO VALUE (select one only)
 a.  Too Fragmentary
 b.  Duplicative
 c.  Untimely
 d.  Not gespons~ive to Tasking Cited
 13.  DEGREE OF REQUIREMENT SATISFACTION (select one only)
 a.  Completely Satisfied
 b.  Partially Satisfied
 co  Not Satisfied At All
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5
 14.  REMARKS (comments should include but not be limited to recommendations for
 application of this unique intelligence methodology)
 15.  DISCLOSURE DATA (select one only)
 a.  Releasable Evaluation Not Requested
 b.  Evaluation Is Not Releasable
 c.  Evaluation Is Releasable on a Need-To-Know Basis
 16.  EVALUATOR'S NAME:
 17.  EVALUATOR'S OFFICE SYMBOL:
 18.  DATE EVALUATED:
 19.  ORIGINATOR OF REQUEST FOR INFORMATION:
 20.  (Signature of evaluator)
 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360006-5