CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH PROGRAM AND ACTIVITIES

CIA-STARGATE

PDF Scan: PDF

Open AI Summary

Summary:
This document is a summary of the current status of research and activities in the Defense Intelligence Agency's Stargate program. It provides information on the contracted status of research projects, overall results from research initiated with FY91 funds, and other interesting research results presented at recent conferences. It also outlines the research plans for FY92, including conducting conferences, developing MEG/EEG correlates, performing EEG measurements, examining subliminal threshold training, and more. Additionally, the document mentions findings and discussions from the Princeton conference, as well as other research presentations.

Text

Body:  Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002900510001-4
 DT-S- 1048 -S
 DEFENSE
 INTELLIGENCE
 AGENCY
 CUHflEIIT STATUS OF AESEAACH
 PFtOGAAItl AIID ACTIVITIES (U)
 13 AUGUST 1992
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002900510001-4
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08! MA~P  P96-00789R002900510001-4
 CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH
 PROGRAM AND ACTIVITIES  (U)
 Date of Publication
 13 August 1992
 CLASSIFIED BY: DIA/DT
 DECLASSIFY ON: OADR
 Approved For Release 2000/18tQ8 :: ~CIA-RDP96-00789R002900510001-4
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002900510001-4
 CONTENTS
 I  PREFACE ..................................................  1
 II  SUMMARY ..................................................  1
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002900510001-4
 Unclassified
 Unclassified
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002900510001-4
 I   (U) This report provides a summary of current status of the
 research program and reviews related activities.
 II (U)  SUMMARY
 (U)   Contracted status of the FY91 and FY92 R&D
 authorization are shown on page 2.
 (U)   Analysis is not yet complete for all research projects.
 However, overall results at this time are summarized on page 3
 for the research initiated with FY91 funds.   Details of results
 to date from this research are in appendix A.
 (U)   Other interesting research results presented at recent
 conferences are summarized on paper 5 and 6.  Appendix B contains
 additional discussions on findings presented at one of the recent
 conferences  (Princeton University).
 1
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002900510001-4
 Unclassified
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002900510001-4
 RESEARCH
 Y     FY 1991 AUTHORIZATION:
 -  FINAL REPORT DUE TO DIA ON 31 AUG 92
 ?     FY 1992 AUTHORIZATION:
 -  CONTRACT PACKAGE ON LINE BY NOV 92
 -  INITIAL PORTION ON LINE 31 JULY 92
 Approved For Release 2000/084g8 CIA-RDP96-00789R002900510001-4
 Approved For Release 2000/      8~'k-ADP96-00789R002900510001-4
 FY 91 RESEARCH RESULTS
 ?   M EG  DATA
 -   INITIAL  ANALYSIS  PROMISING
 -   IMPROVED  METHODOLOGY  LOWERED  RESULTS
 ?   PARAMETER  SERIES
 -   SIGNIFICANT  FOR  STATIC  TARGETS
 -   NO  DIFFERENCE  BETWEEN  BEACON,  NO  BEACON
 -   NO  SIGNIFICANCE  FOR  DYNAMIC  TARGETS
 ?   RV  COMMUNICATION  SERIES
 -   NO  OVERALL  SIGNIFICANCE
 -   LATTER  HALF  SHOWED  IMPROVEMENT
 ?   ALTERED  STATES,  TRAINING  PROJECTS
 -   RESULTS  INDICATE  DATA  IMPROVEMENT  POTENTIAL
 ?   EXPLORATORY  ENERGETICS  (SCALAR  WAVE  DETECTOR)
 RESULTS  PROMISING
 DESCRETE  SPECTRAL  LINES  OBSERVED
 PATTERNS  SUGGEST  A  PULSE  TRAIN
 BACKGROUND  NOISE  MAY  BE  INFLUENCED
 Approved For Release 2000/0  08 : CIL~Q-RDP96-00789R002900510001-4
 (nclaSSlflea
 ~      ~ C~~,SItt~CI   ~
 Approved For Release 2000/0  ~8 : CIA-RDP96-007898002900510001-4
 FY 92 RESEARCH PLANS
 CONDUCT CONFERENCES
 -  -   CONUS,  OVERSEAS
 DEVELOP  MEG/EEG  CORRELATES
 -  -   AMPLITUDE,  PHASE  SHIFTS
 PERFORM  EEG  MEASUREMENTS
 EXAMINE  SUBLIMINAL  THRESHOLD  TRAINING
 PERFORM  COMMUNICATION  FOLLOW-ON
 -   SIMPLIFIED  PROTOCOL
 CONDUCT  RV  PARAMETER  PROJECTS
 -  -   SIMPLIFIED  PROTOCOL,  TIMING
 PURSUE  ENERGETICS
 -  -   SCALAR  WAVE  FOLLOW-ON
 -  -   OTHER  DEVICES  (GRAVITY,  LASER
 PERFORM  OPERTIONS  RESEARCH  PROJECTS
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002900510001-4
 ~nctas~ified
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002900510001-4
 PRINCETON  NJ CONFERENCE
 ENERGETICS  EXPERIMENTS  (DEAN  JAHN~
 -  -   DEVICES  WERE  MECHANICAL,  ELECTRONIC
 SIGNIFICANCE  AT  SEVERAL  THOUSAND  MILES
 THEORETICAL  MODELS
 -  -   QUANTUM  MECHANICAL  CONCEPTS  ADVANCED
 -  -   POSSIBLE  TIE  TO  ZERO-POINT  ENERGY  DISCUSSED
 -  -   POSSIBLE  LINK  BETWEEN  RV/ESP  AND  PK
 POSTULATED
 FOREIGN  ACTIVITIES
 -  -   UNUSUAL  PHYSICAL  EFFECTS  OBSERVED  FROM  BALL
 LIGHTNING
 -  -   METAL  SOFTENING,  ODD  DESTRUCTION
 -  -   REMOTE  HYPNOSIS  CLAIMED
 -  -   QUANTUM  MECHANICAL  DEVICE  CONSTRUCTED  FOR
 MENTAL  PROCESSES
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002900510001-4
 .~
 Approved For Release 2000/0~~~' : CIA-RDP96-007898002900510001-4
 OTHER RESEARCH
 PARAPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE
 -  EEG MEASUREMENTS CORRELATED VI~ITH PERFORMANCE
 -  MENTAL IMAGERY E~CERCISES INCREASED
 PERFORMANCE
 -   ENERGETICS EFFECTS OBSERVED ON BACKGROUND
 RADIATION, PHYSIOLOGY
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002900510001-4
 Unclassified
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002900510001-4
 Approved For Release 2000/08/0$,~.C.IA`F~  ;, 6-007898002900510001-4
 Approved For Release 20~(~j#j~4-RDP96-007898002900510001-4
 This section describes the progress to date for each of the subtasks listed under items 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4
 (basic research, applied research, and research methodology, respectively). The section numbering
 corresponds to the numbering in the Statement of Work.
 6.~ Basic Research
 6.2.1  Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Investigations
 From 15 through 28 March 1992, the third portion of a four-part MEG investigation was carried out
 using receivers from a variety of populations. Details of the protocol maybe found in a separate docu-
 ment,which has been approved by the Scientific Oversight Committee (SOC).t` It is beyond the scope
 of this report to describe the protocol in detail; however, we provide a brief overview here, followed by a
 summary of the analysis and the conclusions to date.
 Protocol. Each of twelve receivers contributes ten blocks of data. Each block consists of ten 2-minute runs,
 each of which contains approximately 100 remote and 100 pseudo stimuli. Each block of data is accompa-
 nied by a control block of equal length during which the conditions are identical to the experimental block;
 however, no receiver is present under the MEG. The dependent variable is the average effect size of the
 root mean square (RMS) relative phase shift (i.e., prestirnulus to poststimulus) of the dominant alpha
 rh}~tlun.
 In February, the statistician from the SOC visited the Cognitive Sciences Laboratory. After reviewing
 the statistics for the MEG project, we noticed that the t-tests that were described in the technical proto-
 col to test difference the between various conditions were not correct because they assumed statistical
 independence between the variables. Measurements of brain waves that occur at 1- to S-second inter-
 valsare likely to be correlated, especially at 10 Hz, nominally the frequency under study. Therefore, the
 statistics used to combine the results of all blocks from a single receiver had to be modified. We provide
 that modification here.
 Consider N blocks of experimental data. Let ~i~ be the number of remote stimuli (RS) for block j, and
 nfP be the number of pseudo stimuli (PS) in block j. Similarly, define cj, and cjp as the corresponding
 effect sizes for block j. We define the weighted effect size for each stimulus type, k, as
 N
 Ek -  ~wjkEjk~
 j=1
 Unciassifie~
 Approved For Release 2000/~~/08 : CIA-RDP96-007898002900510001-4
 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 :CIA-RDP96-007898002900510001-4
 k=r,p.
 Tests Against the Null Hypothesis: s = 0. Since the experimental effect sizes, sjk, aze derived from nor-
 mally distributed data (i.e., Monte Carlo calculations of the RMS phase shift), then we know the stan-
 dard error for each Ejk is
 njk
 (1)
 Thus, the variance of the weighted average effect size is
 Yar(~k) _ ~ wj,~Var(gjr) _
 _     E~
 Z,~                              (2)
 Yar(i